1. It is clearly a lie.
In essence you have NOT observed all
protocols. It is just a claim that the necessarily rules of decorum have
been observed but we all know protocol was overlooked altogether.
Consider this, if you had been asked to pass a vote of thanks, would you
thank one or two people and then state “All thanks given?”
2. There are other ways to observe protocol without having to mention each and every dignitary present.
One way is clustering: You can use a general phrase to address all that fall within a certain category – honourable delegates, distinguished ladies and gentlemen, your excellencies, my Lords etc. That way due diligence is paid.
3. It is a home-grown expression, unrecognised by the rest of the world.
Other than Kenyans, Nigerians, Ugandans and some South Africans who have become accustomed to hearing this, the expression remains totally alien to the rest of the world. Your audience will be at a loss as to what you mean; and as to why you have opted for that ‘short-cut.’
4. It is not necessary to use that expression when protocol has indeed been observed.
At times the speaker does indeed take his or her time to mention the dignitaries in the audience in order of precedence but spoils it by concluding the list with “all protocols observed.” If protocol has indeed been observed then that will be apparent to the audience and therefore redundant to include that out-of-place phrase.
2. There are other ways to observe protocol without having to mention each and every dignitary present.
One way is clustering: You can use a general phrase to address all that fall within a certain category – honourable delegates, distinguished ladies and gentlemen, your excellencies, my Lords etc. That way due diligence is paid.
3. It is a home-grown expression, unrecognised by the rest of the world.
Other than Kenyans, Nigerians, Ugandans and some South Africans who have become accustomed to hearing this, the expression remains totally alien to the rest of the world. Your audience will be at a loss as to what you mean; and as to why you have opted for that ‘short-cut.’
4. It is not necessary to use that expression when protocol has indeed been observed.
At times the speaker does indeed take his or her time to mention the dignitaries in the audience in order of precedence but spoils it by concluding the list with “all protocols observed.” If protocol has indeed been observed then that will be apparent to the audience and therefore redundant to include that out-of-place phrase.
Guest post from
Caroline Nderitu
CERTIFIED PROFESSIONAL TRAINER/POET/MC
www.publicspeaking.co.ke
Point of correction, the entire world use this expression. Only used a little more by the said countries. Trust that, I've been around.
ReplyDeleteGood post though.
On point!!
ReplyDeletePoint taken.Thanks.
ReplyDeletegood one..
ReplyDeleteI first heard that phrase from a member of the British House of Lords
ReplyDeleteI first heard that phrase from a member of the British House of Lords
ReplyDeleteIt is often used in Barbados and the Caribbean
ReplyDeleteI have always heard the phrase but not knowing what it means. All thanks to you
ReplyDeleteThanks for the breakingdown..
ReplyDeletePoint well taken
ReplyDeleteI was actually going to do that at church today, just to sound knowledgeable. But I was goint to greet the organisations and leaders but still say "all protocol observed". Now I know that'll repeatition, thanks to you
ReplyDeleteThanks for that,point well taken, u really helped me.
ReplyDeleteThanks for enlightening us
ReplyDeleteI once heard a speaker proudly
ReplyDeletereefer to other unmentioned guests as other protocols...
ItsI so correct.
DeleteTrue many speakers misuse it
ReplyDeleteI just want to thank you for sharing your information and your site or blog this is simple but nice Information I’ve ever seen i like it i learn something today. African business blog
ReplyDeleteThank you this has really helped me
ReplyDeleteI've attended events at various universities in Australia, US and Zimbabwe. I only heard this in Zimbabwe. Being from Mozambique myself, I wasn't sure what it meant. I googled it and there seems to be a consensus that we should never use it,at least not everywhere.
ReplyDeleteThank you. I've attended faculty events at universities in Australia US and Zimbabwe. I've only heard it in Zim.since I'm from a Portuguese speaking country and wasn't sure what it meant, I googled it...the consensus it do not use it, at least not outside those four countries
ReplyDeleteBest not to use it.
ReplyDeleteI agree that we have been misusing the words
ReplyDeleteEnlightened
ReplyDeleteVery selfish reasons to stop those who accept the phrase as appropriate. You don't have to hear me list titles to know I observe the protocol. On this case, the phrase is used to signal that the speaker appreciates the existence of protocol and even though they are not listed, he/she respects their presence in order of precedence.
ReplyDeleteNoted..
ReplyDeleteInteresting Article. Hoping that you will continue posting an article having a useful information. Jonny Cronin
ReplyDeleteIt's taken me a number of times reading the usage of this phrase, ultimately am now conscientious
ReplyDeleteThis phrase is important to avoid listing all titles
ReplyDelete